Investigating acceptability of a training programme in… Leave a comment

  • European Observatory Health Policy Series. In: Building primary care in a changing Europe. edn. Edited by Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, Saltman RB. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies © World Health Organization 2015 (acting as the host organization for, and secretariat of, the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies). 2015.

  • Tsimberidou AM, Hong DS, Wheler JJ, Falchook GS, Naing A, Fu S, Piha-Paul SA, Janku F, Cartwright C, Broaddus R. Precision medicine: Clinical outcomes including long-term survival according to the pathway targeted and treatment period–The IMPACT study. In.: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):793–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M: Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017(6).

  • Janiaud P, Serghiou S, Ioannidis JPA. New clinical trial designs in the era of precision medicine: An overview of definitions, strengths, weaknesses, and current use in oncology. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;73:20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Lancet O. Making precision oncology the standard of care. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(7):835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayvanpour E, Sedaghat-Hamedani F, Levinson RT, Li D, Miersch T, Gi WT, Grabe N, Lahrmann B, Taeger T, Frankenstein L et al: Precision medicine: myocardial fibrosis burden and genotype predict outcome in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). European Heart Journal 2020, 41(Supplement_2).

  • Bayes-Genis A, Voors AA, Zannad F, Januzzi JL, Mark Richards A, Díez J. Transitioning from usual care to biomarker-based personalized and precision medicine in heart failure: call for action. Eur Heart J. 2017;39(30):2793–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung KF. Precision medicine in asthma: linking phenotypes to targeted treatments. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018;24(1):4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Bastard P, Liu Z, Le Pen J, Moncada-Velez M, Chen J, Ogishi M, Sabli IKD, Hodeib S, Korol C et al: Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 2020, 370(6515).

  • Agustí A, Bafadhel M, Beasley R, Bel EH, Faner R, Gibson PG, Louis R, McDonald VM, Sterk PJ, Thomas M: Precision medicine in airway diseases: moving to clinical practice. European Respiratory Journal 2017, 50(4).

  • Wang DD, Hu FB. Precision nutrition for prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(5):416–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin R. Precision medicine: the future or simply politics? JAMA. 2015;313(11):1089–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feero WG. Is “Precision Medicine” Ready to Use in Primary Care Practice? Yes: It Offers Patients More Individualized Ways of Managing Their Health. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(12):767–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley A, Azzam K, Chan TM: Redesigning continuing professional development: Harnessing design thinking to go from needs assessment to mandate. Perspectives on Medical Education 2020:1–6.

  • Asch DA, Weinstein DF. Innovation in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(9):794–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MS, Kirchner J. Implementation science: what is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon AR, Cook CR, Brown EC, Locke J, Davis C, Ehrhart M, Aarons GA. Assessing organizational implementation context in the education sector: confirmatory factor analysis of measures of implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly B, Perkins DF: Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

  • Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. The science of training: a decade of progress. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:471–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox RD, Bennett NL. Continuing medical education: learning and change: implications for continuing medical education. BMJ. 1998;316(7129):466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCawley PF. Methods for conducting an educational needs assessment. University of Idaho. 2009;23:6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux D. Curriculum design. BMJ. 2003;326(7383):268–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro LM, Park MO, Mariano DJ, Kamal RN. Development of a needs assessment tool to promote capacity building in hand surgery outreach trips: A methodological triangulation approach. J Hand Surg. 2020;45(8):729-737 e721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway K, Arcus K, Orsborn G. Training needs analysis–The essential first step for continuing professional development design. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;28:7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayahangan LJ, Stefanidis D, Kern DE, Konge L. How to identify and prioritize procedures suitable for simulation-based training: Experiences from general needs assessments using a modified Delphi method and a needs assessment formula. Med Teach. 2018;40(7):676–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes SM, Dupuis M, Murray S. Issues and challenges in the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors: Assessing the needs of cardiologists. BMC Med Educ. 2008;8(1):30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins RA: Exploratory research in the social sciences, vol. 48: Sage; 2001.

  • Goodenough A, Waite S: Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. In.: Taylor & Francis; 2012.

  • Stalmeijer RE, McNaughton N, Van Mook WN: Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Medical teacher 2014, 36(11):923–939.

  • Williams N, Nagle B: Methodology Brief Introduction To focus groups. Center for Assessment, Planning & Accountability Retrieved August 2013, 8.

  • Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):312–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY: Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach: JHU press; 2016.

  • Fernandez ME, Ten Hoor GA, van Lieshout S, Rodriguez SA, Beidas RS, Parcel G, Ruiter RA, Markham CM, Kok G. Implementation mapping: using intervention mapping to develop implementation strategies. Front Public Health. 2019;7:158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour R. Doing focus groups. London: Sage; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoot C, Hannes K, Bilsen J. The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. Nyumba T, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N: The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and evolution 2018, 9(1):20–32.

  • Krueger RA: Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research: Sage publications; 2014.

  • Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke M, Goodrich KM: Focus group research: An intentional strategy for applied group research? In., vol. 44: Taylor & Francis; 2019: 77–81.

  • Adams A, Cox A: Questionnaires, in-depth interviews and focus groups. Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction 2008:17–34.

  • Klimek L, Bergmann K-C, Biedermann T, Bousquet J, Hellings P, Jung K, Merk H, Olze H, Schlenter W, Stock P, et al. Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care: Position Paper of the German Society of Allergology (AeDA) and the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), ENT Section, in collaboration with the working group on Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Environmental Medicine of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKHC). Allergo journal international. 2017;26(1):16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger J: Focus Group Research: Using Group Dynamics to Explore Perceptions. Experiences and 2005.

  • Esposito N. From meaning to meaning: The influence of translation techniques on non-English focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(4):568–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HY, Boore JR. Translation and back-translation in qualitative nursing research: methodological review. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(1–2):234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilal AH, Alabri SS. Using NVivo for data analysis in qualitative research. International interdisciplinary journal of education. 2013;2(2):181–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald MM. Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2016;10(3):228–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch T. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(5):976–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011;38(2):65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins H, Calvo S, Greenberg K, Forman Neall L, Morrison S. Information Needs in the Precision Medicine Era: How Genetics Home Reference Can Help. Interact J Med Res. 2016;5(2): e13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami R, Bayer R, Galea S. Precision Medicine from a Public Health Perspective. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:153–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg GS, Phillips KA. Precision medicine: from science to value. Health Aff. 2018;37(5):694–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JC, Makuwaza T, Manca DP, Sopcak N, Permaul JA, O’Brien MA, Heisey R, Eisenhauer EA, Easley J, Krzyzanowska MK, et al. Primary care providers’ experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien. 2016;62(10):e626–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):388–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twilt M. Precision Medicine: The new era in medicine. EBioMedicine. 2016;4:24–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm DJ, Brenner S, Muula AS, De Allegri M. A qualitative study assessing the acceptability and adoption of implementing a results based financing intervention to improve maternal and neonatal health in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haga SB, Kim E, Myers RA, Ginsburg GS. Primary care physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and experience with personal genetic testing. Journal of personalized medicine. 2019;9(2):29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haga SB, Mills R, Aucoin J, Taekman J. Interprofessional education for personalized medicine through technology-based learning. Pers Med. 2015;12(3):237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krakau F, Doll L, Mitzkat A: An interprofessional core elective module on the scholarly presentation of projects: implementation in an online format. GMS journal for medical education 2021, 38(5):Doc90-Doc90.

  • Mitchell S, Riha RL, Rohde G, Simonds AK. Continuing professional development: introducing the ERS International Certificate in Respiratory Sleep Medicine. Breathe (Sheff). 2017;13(1):11–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang P-H, Haywood M, O’Sullivan A, Shulruf B. A meta-analysis for comparing effective teaching in clinical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(10):1129–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow SA. Six principles to enhance health workforce flexibility. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qoronfleh MW, Chouchane L, Mifsud B, Al Emadi M, Ismail S. THE FUTURE OF MEDICINE, healthcare innovation through precision medicine: policy case study of Qatar. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. 2020;16(1):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy DJ. Problems, challenges and promises: perspectives on precision medicine. Brief Bioinform. 2016;17(3):494–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JN, Farmer EA, Weston KM, Bushnell JA. Using a framework to implement large-scale innovation in medical education with the intent of achieving sustainability. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan DJ, McConnell B, O’Sullivan H. Continuing professional development–why bother? Perceptions and motivations of teachers in Ireland. Prof Dev Educ. 2016;42(1):150–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller FA, Hayeems RZ, Bytautas JP, Bedard PL, Ernst S, Hirte H, Hotte S, Oza A, Razak A, Welch S. Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(3):391–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Kim H, Bell E, Bath T, Paul P, Pham A, Jiang X, Zheng K, Ohno-Machado L. Patient perspectives about decisions to share medical data and biospecimens for research. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e199550–e199550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis JM: The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. 2007.

  • Hunter DJ. Uncertainty in the era of precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):711–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando LA, Henrich VC, Hauser ER, Wilson C, Ginsburg GS. The genomic medicine model: an integrated approach to implementation of family health history in primary care. Pers Med. 2013;10(3):295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nursimulu A, Florin M-V: Workshop Report: The Economics of Precision Medicine. In.: EPFL IRGC; 2018.

  • Dzau V, Ginsburg GS, Finkelman E, Balatbat C, Flott K, Prestt J: Precision Medicine A Global Action Plan for Impact. WISH Forums Reports: World Innovation Summit for Health 2016.

  • Ong S, Ling J, Ballantyne A, Lysaght T, Xafis V. Perceptions of ‘Precision’and ‘Personalised’Medicine in Singapore and Associated Ethical Issues. Asian Bioethics Review. 2021;13(2):179–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton EW. Ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(6):562–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles D, Appelbaum PS. Cases in precision medicine: concerns about privacy and discrimination after genomic sequencing. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(10):717–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn RM, Adams KT, Kowalski RL, Shivega WG, Ratwani RM, Miller KE: The patient in precision medicine: a systematic review examining evaluations of patient-facing materials. Journal of healthcare engineering 2018, 2018.

  • Juengst ET, Settersten RA, Fishman JR, McGowan ML. After the revolution? Ethical and social challenges in ‘personalized genomic medicine.’ Pers Med. 2012;9(4):429–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moir T: Why is implementation science important for intervention design and evaluation within educational settings? In: Frontiers in Education: 2018: Frontiers; 2018: 61.

  • Source

    Leave a Reply

    SHOPPING CART

    close